You might be able to change it, but it'll be tedious and made such that you have to really, REALLY want to change it before it's allowed. any less than 2 years old, possibly more) the wifi passphrase will be preset to something very long and very random, and provided in or along with the documentation for the device. This makes it both sufficiently easy for the end-user to setup and sufficiently difficult for the end-user to later change it into 'mysecretpw' or whatever braindead letter combo they do manage to remember.įor the current crop of routers currently provided by ISPs that are wifi-enabled (i.e.
#Wpa2 wordlist 2014 password
Further, perhaps there are other WPA(2) attacks that can obtain the PSK of which I am unaware.Ī) While previously people went out and bought their own router which came with either absent or shitty default passwords, pretty much all modern routers include a wizard that will help the user set up their AP with a generated password sequence which is totally random and advise the user to write this down or run the wizard again if they want to change it. I would appreciate any comments on the above scenarios.
#Wpa2 wordlist 2014 windows 8
For example, if I deauth myself (on a different computer) from a Windows 8 system, it will not then connect to any open systems in the vicinity even if I had connected to them before.
However, my impression is that modern systems are less likely to automatically connect. (It's not therefore necessary for the SSID to be so similar but the Musket Teams idea looks good for social engineering purposes). AIUI, the idea is that the target's system will start to send out probe requests to open networks to which it previous connected, and the attacker system claims it is one of these networks. In other words, if the real SSID is "SKY12345" the softAP SSID would be "SKY12345. My impression is that the user has to manually connect because their real SSID uses WPA(2) and hence, after the deauth, their system will not automatically connect to an open network (even one that uses the same SSID).Ī variation, promoted by Musket Teams on the Kali Linux forums, is to use a very similar SSID. This attack requires the user to manually connect to an open network rather than their real WPA(2) network. The user then attempts to reconnect to his network but accidentally connects to you because your SSID shows up in the network list and its Tx power is superior to that of the genuine router. You deauth the client from the genuine AP using airplay-ng. You create an open network (a softAP) with the same SSID as that of the network you are targeting. However, if there is only one AP, the likelihood of success is minimal.Ĭ) AIUI, the main tool is PwnStar ( ). As Digininja notes, an organisation with 100 APs might have one that is vulnerable ( ). This is not to say that Reaver is always ineffective. After all, the issue is not Reaver, but with how routers now function whether they are sold new or have had firmware updates. I am currently playing with the Reaver fork, version 1.5, but am not optimistic that it will improve matters (based on users' comments) ( ). In these scenarios, Reaver does not discover the first four digits of the WPS PIN and goes into a loop. Even those that do not lock have other errors. Then, of those that can, the majority time out due to WPS locking.
Checking the number of routers discovered by airodump-ng compared to those recorded by wash, will indicate that about 50% of routers cannot be targeted by the WPS attack. First, the target router must be WPS enabled. And, of course, there is no guarantee that the default password has not been changed.ī) In my opinion, the main WPS cracking tool, Reaver, is effectively dead. requests 0.58BTC which is currently $176 or £111. The lowercase 10 hex attack is 1100GB worth of keywords. These attempts demand energy and hence are expensive. Often used as a default WPA password for broadband routers: BTHomeHub(1-4)-xxxx." According to "Full range of 10 hexadecimal lowercase digits (0000000000-ffffffffff). The default SSIDs may suggest that the owners also use default passwords.
For example, I observer various BTHomeHub2-XXXX, BTHub3-XXXX, and SKYXXXXX names. Of note, most routers that I can see in my area have default SSIDs. My impression is that most people these days use non-dictionary passwords. Moxie Marlinspike's uses a 604 million word dictionary but charges $17 per attempt whether successful or unsuccessful.
The site claims that they use a 337 million word dictionary. As an experiment, I acquired the 4-way handshake of ten APs in the vicinity. In my opinion, there are three ways to target WPA(2).Ī) My opinion is that PSK dictionary cracking is unlikely to work. I want to comment on how I understand WPA(2) cracking based on the situation today.